近日,教育博主“一五老師”發文對上海古籍出版社出版的《西廂記》一書提出批評,稱發現多處錯誤。
12月7日,上海古籍出版社就《西廂記》一書編校質量問題,發布情況通報稱,已“通知經銷商全面下架該書”,“并向廣大讀者表示誠摯的歉意”。
A Chinese education blogger's public criticism has led to a major publisher recalling and apologizing for a classic literary work due to numerous editorial errors.
情況通報如下:
12月2日晚,有讀者在網絡平臺對上海古籍出版社出版的《西廂記》一書提出批評,稱發現多處錯誤。上海古籍出版社第一時間啟動圖書質量檢查程序。12月3日,我社即通知經銷商全面下架該書。12月4日,完成該書的質檢報告,確認該書存在編校質量問題。對此,我們深感愧疚,并向廣大讀者表示誠摯的歉意。
12月5日,上海古籍出版社負責人專程赴京聯系該讀者,希望能夠當面聽取意見建議,但因該讀者表示工作繁忙而未能當面溝通。我社負責人通過短信向其反饋了初步處理情況,并對該讀者提出的批評指正表達了衷心感謝。
12月6日,上海古籍出版社召開圖書質量工作專題會議,就《西廂記》一書中暴露出的內部管理問題和質量把關問題,進行深刻反思并研究整改措施;要求全社上下吸取教訓、舉一反三,強調要始終把編校質量作為出版社的生命線。
Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House announced on Sunday that it had initiated a quality check immediately after being alerted. The publisher said it ordered all distributors to remove the book from shelves on Wednesday and completed a quality assessment report on Thursday, confirming the existence of editorial problems.
The publisher also revealed that on Friday, a senior representative traveled to Beijing, hoping to meet the blogger in person, but was unable to do so as the blogger cited a busy schedule. Feedback and gratitude were instead conveyed via text message.
An internal meeting was held on Saturday to reflect on the management and quality control issues exposed by this case and to formulate corrective measures. The publisher emphasized it would "learn its lesson" and reaffirmed that editorial quality is its "lifeline".
![]()
近日,教育博主“一五老師”發推文和視頻稱,上海古籍出版社出版的“國學典藏”系列的《西廂記》一書當中,存在多處錯誤。“我只粗略看了一遍,就發現了300多個各種各樣千奇百怪的錯誤。”這位博主在12月2日的推文當中表示。
The incident began on Dec 2 when the blogger, known online as "Teacher Yiwu", posted on social media claiming to have found over 300 errors in a version of
The Romance of the West Chamberby Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House. The book is part of the publisher's "Classics Collection" series.
![]()
教育博主“一五老師”標注出前言中的錯誤
12月2日,上海古籍出版社在這位博主的視頻評論區回應稱:“尊敬的讀者您好,我們已關注到您對我社國學典藏版《西廂記》前言諸疑誤的批評。這些問題將反饋給編輯部門,予以核實,并對該書作進一步檢查。感謝您對我社的關注,您的指正將會幫助我們進步。”
![]()
上海古籍出版社在“一五老師”的視頻評論區回應
“一五老師”對此在視頻評論區進行了回復,并表示,他個人對出版社的回復并不滿意:“看來您還沒意識翻這本書的質量問題的嚴重性。我這個視頻只說了前言是因為全書錯誤實在太多了,一個視頻根本說不完。我粗讀一遍就找出了300多處,正文問題比前言更多。”
“一五老師”稱,除了《西廂記》這本書的前言部分,在序言當中,短短300多字,竟然出現了12處錯誤,有些還是嚴重的、致命的錯誤。
In his posts and videos, the blogger detailed mistakes in the preface, introduction, and main text, calling some errors "severe and fatal". He stated that in one 300-word preface alone, he identified 12 issues.
![]()
“一五老師”標注出序言中的不少錯誤
12月5日,“一五老師”在繼續糾錯《西廂記》的同時,又指出了另一本出版物存在編校錯誤,“‘語文課推薦閱讀叢書’之《世說新語》,短短兩本100多頁的小冊子,至少有30多處錯誤!”
12月6日,中華書局回應并向各經銷商發布了下架通知。
This is not the only publication "Teacher Yiwu" has recently criticized. On Friday, he pointed out alleged errors in another publication,
A New Account of the Tales of the Worldfrom the "Chinese Curriculum Recommended Reading Series."
On Saturday, its publisher, Zhonghua Book Company, also issued a recall notice.
![]()
“一五老師”的連續糾錯行為引發網友熱議,有不少網友表示支持,認為出版圖書有如此多的錯誤實在不應該,有損出版社的信譽,為博主較真的態度點贊,也為當前出版社編校質量下降感到擔憂。
The blogger's actions have sparked online debate. Many netizens support his meticulous approach, arguing that such a high error rate in published books is unacceptable and damages publisher's credibility. They express concern over declining editorial standards.
![]()
![]()
![]()
也有網友認為當代學者與古代學人的知識范圍存在不對稱,古籍整理難度大,不能對編輯過于苛責,一味指責難以推動問題實質性解決。
一名圖書編輯行業從業者表示,現在出版社對突出質量把控其實還是很嚴格的,對圖書質量不滿向出版社投訴、反饋,提出修改意見,出版社都是歡迎的,讀者糾錯促進圖書行業提升質量是好事,但編輯的錯誤是永遠無法徹底地消除的,其個人擔心可能會出現部分心懷不軌者專門挑起事端獲取流量,放大了編校差錯問題和讀者對于圖書質量的焦慮。
Others, however, urge understanding, noting the significant challenge of annotating ancient texts for modern readers and the difficulty in completely eliminating errors. Some within the publishing industry worry that while reader feedback is valuable for improving quality, excessive focus on minor flaws could be exploited for sensationalism and unnecessarily heighten public anxiety about book quality.
來源:新聞晨報 揚子晚報 新京報 中國新聞周刊
跟著China Daily
精讀英語新聞
“無痛”學英語,每天20分鐘就夠!
特別聲明:以上內容(如有圖片或視頻亦包括在內)為自媒體平臺“網易號”用戶上傳并發布,本平臺僅提供信息存儲服務。
Notice: The content above (including the pictures and videos if any) is uploaded and posted by a user of NetEase Hao, which is a social media platform and only provides information storage services.