買家半年“僅退款”225個(gè)快遞，朋友圈內(nèi)容曝光！最新解讀

近日，有商家在社交媒體曝光半年來她被買家劉某利用平臺(tái)漏洞，用6個(gè)賬號(hào)“僅退款”225個(gè)包裹。相關(guān)消息引發(fā)關(guān)注。

A vendor has revealed that she was exploited for six months by a customer who allegedly used loopholes on an e-commerce platform to secure 225 packages through "refund-only" claims.

12月7日，話題“僅退款225個(gè)快遞女子打造富婆人設(shè)”沖上微博熱搜。

據(jù)報(bào)道，商家時(shí)女士發(fā)視頻稱，半年來她被一位女顧客劉某利用平臺(tái)漏洞，用6個(gè)賬號(hào)“僅退款”225件331單。

該女子每次會(huì)在店鋪購買多樣商品，商品價(jià)格從十幾元到幾百上千元不等。并且其在快遞還未簽收時(shí)，將貴價(jià)商品申請僅退款“攔截快遞”，再將低價(jià)商品的面單與貴價(jià)商品交換，把低價(jià)商品當(dāng)成貴價(jià)商品退回。

According to media reports, the merchant, surnamed Shi, said in a video that a customer surnamed Liu used six accounts to submit 225 "refund-only" claims across 331 orders.

Liu allegedly purchased items priced from a few dozen yuan to over a thousand yuan, then requested refunds before delivery and swapped shipping labels to return low-cost products in place of high-value ones.

劉某還在網(wǎng)上打造富婆人設(shè)銷售所得財(cái)物，2020年，劉某曾經(jīng)發(fā)朋友圈稱：“你們都在搬磚，我在搬人民幣，都是一袋子一袋子給，這兩天光安排人存錢了！”這些行為導(dǎo)致商家時(shí)女士損失5.4萬余元。目前時(shí)女士已報(bào)警。

Shi said Liu resold the fraudulently obtained goods online while cultivating a wealthy persona. A 2020 social media post showed Liu boasting, "You're all moving bricks, I'm moving bags of cash — I've spent days having people deposit money!" Shi said the scheme caused her losses of more than 54,000 yuan, and she has reported the case to police.

劉某在朋友圈和粉絲群炫富 圖源：Hui 時(shí)小姐

事發(fā)后劉某轉(zhuǎn)賬求和解

時(shí)女士將事情在網(wǎng)上曝光后，她稱收到多位商家私信“他們也遇到了同樣的事”，核對地址后發(fā)現(xiàn)是同一個(gè)人。

時(shí)女士向媒體表示，事發(fā)后對方轉(zhuǎn)賬給她“求和解”，“我拒絕了，成年人應(yīng)該得到應(yīng)有的判罰”。

After Shi went public, several other merchants contacted her with similar complaints, and they later confirmed the buyer was the same individual. Shi added that Liu later transferred money attempting to negotiate a settlement, but she refused, saying adults should face the consequences of their actions.

劉某轉(zhuǎn)賬欲補(bǔ)齊差價(jià)希望留條路 圖源：Hui 時(shí)小姐

時(shí)女士展示的受案回執(zhí)顯示，廣州市公安局增城區(qū)分局衛(wèi)山派出所已受理該案。

律師解讀：

女子的行為已構(gòu)成詐騙罪

浙江五聯(lián)律師事務(wù)所律師張建齊認(rèn)為，該女子的行為已構(gòu)成詐騙罪，其主觀上具有非法占有目的，下單時(shí)就無支付對價(jià)意愿，還通過更換快遞面單等隱秘手段騙取財(cái)物，且將贓物轉(zhuǎn)賣牟利，符合詐騙罪的構(gòu)成要件。

同時(shí)，根據(jù)時(shí)女士視頻稱，劉某曾向時(shí)女士轉(zhuǎn)賬兩次，分別為2萬元和3萬元希望時(shí)女士“留一條路”。

張律師認(rèn)為，劉某其實(shí)際犯罪所得可能不低于2萬-3萬元，而詐騙罪入罪金額為3000-1萬元（對應(yīng)3年以下有期徒刑）；若金額達(dá)3萬元以上則屬“數(shù)額巨大”，將面臨3-10年有期徒刑。

Zhang Jianqi, a lawyer with Zhejiang Wulian Law Firm, said Liu's actions clearly constitute criminal fraud. Liu deliberately avoided paying for the goods, used deceptive tactics such as switching shipping labels, and resold the items for profit, he said.

Zhang added that Liu's actual illegal gains may exceed 20,000–30,000 yuan, the amounts she transferred while seeking leniency. Under Chinese law, fraud involving 3,000–10,000 yuan is punishable by up to three years in prison, while cases above 30,000 yuan can carry a three- to ten-year sentence.

部分網(wǎng)友認(rèn)為快遞員或者驛站也負(fù)有責(zé)任，張律師告訴記者，快遞員或驛站若無明知或串通行為，則無需為此承擔(dān)責(zé)任，因該行為屬于獨(dú)立違法犯罪，非普通合作行為。

Addressing speculation that couriers or pickup stations might share responsibility, Zhang said they would not be liable unless they acted with knowledge or collusion.

來源：中國青年報(bào) 極目新聞 瀟湘晨報(bào) @錢江視頻

跟著China Daily

精讀英語新聞

“無痛”學(xué)英語，每天20分鐘就夠！