大洋馬夫“國際加油站”第27期：根據《開羅宣言》和《波茨坦公告》，戰勝國要求日本“去勢”——去工業化和去軍事化合法合理

《開羅宣言》和《波茨坦公告》是確定日本罪行和戰后處置日本問題的兩份重要的國際法律文件。

《開羅宣言》的核心目標就是“日本無條件投降”。盟國對日作戰的目的就是為了制止和懲罰日本對他國的侵略，將日本打回“原型”。這就是表明了要求日本去軍事化的態度。

《波茨坦公告》是對日本的最后通牒，詳細規定了日本投降的條件和戰后處理方針，其中去軍事化是其最核心、最具體的內容。

針對日本“去軍事化”的條款更加直白和明確：

第6條【永久消除軍國主義與戰爭能力】：“欺騙及錯誤領導日本人民使其妄欲征服世界者之威權及勢力，必須永久剔除。蓋吾人堅持非將負責之窮兵黷武主義驅出世界，則和平安全及正義之新秩序勢不可能。”解讀：這是政治和思想上的去軍事化，要求徹底清除軍國主義領導層和意識形態。

第7條【占領日本本土直至目標達成】：“直至如此之新秩序成立時，及直至日本制造戰爭之力量業已毀滅，有確定可信之證據時，日本領土上經盟國指定之地點，必須占領，俾吾人在此陳述之基本目的得以完成。”解讀：明確了為達成去軍事化目標，盟軍將對日本本土實施軍事占領。

第9條【解除武裝與遣返軍隊】：“日本軍隊在完全解除武裝以后，將被允許返其家鄉，得有和平及生產生活之機會。”解讀：這是最直接、最物理層面的去軍事化：所有日本軍事力量必須被完全解除武裝并解散。

第10條【懲罰戰爭罪犯與民主化】：“吾人無意奴役日本民族或消滅其國家，但對于戰罪人犯，包括虐待吾人俘虜者在內，將處以法律之嚴厲制裁。日本政府必須將阻止日本人民民主趨勢之復興及增強之所有障礙予以消除……”解讀：通過審判戰犯，清除軍國主義核心分子。同時推動民主化，從制度上防止軍國主義復辟。

第11條【限制工業，防止戰爭潛力復活】：“日本將被允許維持其經濟所必需及可以償付實物賠償之工業，但可以使其重新武裝作戰之工業不在其內。”解讀：這是經濟層面的去軍事化，嚴格限制可用于軍事目的的工業生產能力，只保留和平產業。實質上，這也是對日本“去工業化”的要求。

這兩份法律文件共同構建了一個多層次、全方位的日本“去軍事化”和“去工業化”框架的定性：

領土剝奪：剝奪其侵略所得的所有領土和戰略要地，削弱其地緣戰略基礎。

武裝解除：所有日本軍隊必須被完全解除武裝并解散。

占領控制：盟軍占領日本本土，確保上述條款被強制執行。

政治清算：永久剔除軍國主義權威與勢力，審判戰犯。

思想改造：消除軍國主義思想，引入民主趨勢。

經濟閹割：摧毀其戰爭工業潛力，只保留和平經濟。

在后續的執行過程中，盟軍最高司令官道格拉斯﹒麥克阿瑟先生率軍占領并“殖民”了日本，實事求是而言，在占領的初期（1945-1947年）嚴格推行了這些政策：

解散了全部日本陸軍、海軍和參謀本部。

廢除了《兵役法》、《國防保安法》等軍事法令。

拆除了大量軍工設施，將其作為賠償。

開展了東京審判，清算戰犯。

頒布了以“放棄戰爭”為核心的 《日本國憲法》（和平憲法）第九條，明確規定日本“永遠放棄以國權發動的戰爭、武力威脅或武力行使作為解決國際爭端的手段”，“不保持陸海空軍及其他戰爭力量，不承認國家的交戰權”。這是將《波茨坦公告》去軍事化要求內化為日本國家根本大法的最高體現。

但到了后期，美國出于自身私利，并未嚴格執行《開羅宣言》和《波茨坦公告》的有關規定，給日本進行了部分“松綁”，對日本的處置并不徹底，這也造就了今天的隱患。

盡管如此，《開羅宣言》和《波茨坦公告》是二戰后日本被強制去軍事化、走向和平國家道路的原始國際法依據和根本政策藍圖。具有不可撤銷的法律效力和不可撼動的歷史地位。國際社會對日本的安排十分明確且形成了統一的意見：必須解除日本之武裝，不能保留任何能恢復日本軍事力量的工業能力。過去幾十年，我們為了世界的和平與發展，不找麻煩，睜一只眼閉一只眼，默許日本保留強大的工業能力，日本卻不感恩。然而，如今日本軍國主義抬頭，試圖重走戰爭的“老路”和“思路”。那么、我們也就沒有什么可以顧及的了，直接對日本事實“去勢手術”，明確日本必須“去軍事化”和“去工業化”的目標。一劍封喉，弄死日本。

2026年01月6日，我國商務部第1號“關于加強兩用物項對日本出口管制的公告”，該公告字數不多，“劍掃”日本。清單明確列出了1038種物項，涵蓋了中重稀土、高性能金屬材料、航空航天部件，甚至包括某些關鍵的芯片制造原材料。這是劃了紅線的：凡是可能用于提升日本軍事能力的物品，不管是直接還是間接，只要最終用戶是日本軍方或與軍備相關的一切，都一律禁止出口。還有那條防止“二轉手”的補充條款：如果日本想從第三國采購這些物資轉賣過去，也不允許、一并禁止，否則、這些“二轉手”的國家也將受到制裁別指望再從我國拿貨了。這一次，我們要的就是徹底堵死日本走所謂“曲線救國”的路。可謂是明確要求日本全面解除武裝，并取消生產軍事武裝武器的工業基礎。這一步棋走的非常正確，這一招兒就是對日本進行掏肛。不動則已，一動就要弄死日本而毫不客氣。我們不僅有《開羅宣言》和《波茨坦公告》規定的法律依據，最重要的是我們還有一個原子彈級別的國際法律文件《聯合國憲章》中規定的敵國條款，隨時都可以對日本動手。

（以下是英文版 The next is English edition）

"Global Refuel Station", Issue 27: According to the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Proclamation, It Is Legitimate and Reasonable for the Victorious Nations to Demand Japan's 'Castration'—Demilitarization and Deindustrialization

(Midday, January 17, 2026)

The Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation are two crucial international legal documents that determined Japan's crimes and the post-war disposition of Japan.

The core objective of the Cairo Declaration was the "unconditional surrender of Japan." The purpose of the Allied war against Japan was to stop and punish its aggression against other nations, to force Japan back to its "original state." This clearly indicated the demand for Japan's demilitarization.

The Potsdam Proclamation was an ultimatum to Japan, detailing the conditions for its surrender and the post-war treatment policy. Demilitarization was its most central and specific content.

The clauses concerning Japan's "demilitarization" were even more blunt and explicit:

Article 6 :"There must be eliminated for all time the authority and influence of those who have deceived and misled the people of Japan into embarking on world conquest, for we insist that a new order of peace, security and justice will be impossible until irresponsible militarism is driven from the world." Interpretation: This refers to political and ideological demilitarization, demanding the complete eradication of militarist leadership and ideology.

Article 7 :"Until such a new order is established and until there is convincing proof that Japan's war-making power is destroyed, points in Japanese territory to be designated by the Allies shall be occupied to secure the achievement of the basic objectives we are here setting forth." Interpretation: It clarifies that to achieve demilitarization goals, Allied forces would militarily occupy the Japanese homeland.

Article 9 :"The Japanese military forces, after being completely disarmed, shall be permitted to return to their homes with the opportunity to lead peaceful and productive lives." Interpretation: This is the most direct, physical level of demilitarization: all Japanese military forces must be completely disarmed and disbanded.

Article 10 :"We do not intend that the Japanese shall be enslaved as a race or destroyed as a nation, but stern justice shall be meted out to all war criminals, including those who have visited cruelties upon our prisoners. The Japanese Government shall remove all obstacles to the revival and strengthening of democratic tendencies among the Japanese people..." Interpretation: Through the trial of war criminals, the core elements of militarism are purged. Simultaneously, democratization is promoted to prevent the revival of militarism institutionally.

Article 11 :"Japan shall be permitted to maintain such industries as will sustain her economy and permit the payment of just reparations in kind, but not those which would enable her to re-arm for war." Interpretation: This is economic demilitarization, strictly limiting industrial production capacity usable for military purposes, permitting only peaceful industries. In essence, this also constitutes a demand for Japan's "deindustrialization."

These two legal documents together establish a multi-layered, comprehensive framework for Japan's "demilitarization" and "deindustrialization":

Territorial Deprivation:Stripping Japan of all territories and strategic points acquired through aggression, weakening its geopolitical foundation.

Disarmament:Complete disarmament and disbandment of all Japanese military forces.

Occupation and Control:Allied occupation of the Japanese homeland to ensure enforcement of the above clauses.

Political Reckoning:Permanent elimination of militarist authority and influence, trial of war criminals.

Ideological Transformation:Eradication of militarist ideology, introduction of democratic trends.

Economic 'Castration':Destruction of its war-industrial potential, retention of only a peaceful economy.

During subsequent implementation, Allied Supreme Commander General Douglas MacArthur led the occupation and, in effect, "colonized" Japan. To be factual, in the initial phase of the occupation (1945-1947), these policies were strictly enforced:

Disbanded the entire Japanese Army, Navy, and General Staff Office.

Abolished military laws such as theConscription Law and the National Defense Security Law.

Dismantled a large number of military-industrial facilities for reparations.

Conducted the Tokyo Trials to settle accounts with war criminals.

Promulgated theConstitution of Japan (Peace Constitution), with its Article 9 at its core, explicitly stating that Japan "forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as means of settling international disputes," and that "land, sea, and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be maintained. The right of belligerency of the state will not be recognized." This represents the highest embodiment of internalizing the Potsdam Proclamation's demilitarization requirements into Japan's fundamental national law.

However, in later stages, driven by self-interest, the United States did not strictly enforce the relevant provisions of the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Proclamation, granting Japan partial "loosening of restrictions." The disposition of Japan was not thorough, which has contributed to today's latent dangers.

Nevertheless, the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation remain the original basis in international law and the fundamental policy blueprint for Japan's forced demilitarization and its path toward becoming a peaceful nation after World War II. They possess irrevocable legal validity and an unshakable historical status. The international community's arrangement for Japan was clear and formed a unified consensus: Japan's armaments must be dismantled, and it cannot retain any industrial capacity that could restore its military power. For decades, for the sake of world peace and development, we chose not to stir up trouble, turned a blind eye, and tacitly allowed Japan to maintain a powerful industrial capacity. Yet Japan shows no gratitude. Now, with Japanese militarism rearing its head again and attempting to retread the "old path" and "mindset" of war, we have nothing left to consider. We should directly perform a "castration surgery" on Japan, explicitly setting the goals of Japan's "demilitarization" and "deindustrialization." Strike a fatal blow and finish off Japan.

On January 6, 2026, China's Ministry of Commerce issued Announcement No. 1, "Announcement on Strengthening Export Controls on Dual-Use Items to Japan." This brief announcement "sweeps across" Japan. The list clearly specifies 1,038 items, covering medium and heavy rare earths, high-performance metal materials, aerospace components, and even certain key raw materials for chip manufacturing. This draws a red line: Any items that could potentially enhance Japan's military capabilities, whether directly or indirectly, are prohibited from export as long as the end-user is the Japanese military or anything related to armaments. There is also that supplementary clause preventing "diversion": If Japan attempts to purchase these materials from third countries for resale, that is also prohibited. Otherwise, these "diversion" countries will also face sanctions and can forget about obtaining goods from China in the future. This time, our goal is to completely block Japan's path of so-called "indirect salvation." This can be seen as explicitly demanding Japan's complete disarmament and the elimination of the industrial base for producing military weaponry. This move is very correct—it's a maneuver targeting Japan's vital weak point. We either don't act, but once we do, we must finish off Japan without mercy. We not only have the legal basis stipulated in the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Proclamation, but most importantly, we also have an atomic bomb-level international legal document—the "enemy state clauses" stipulated in theUnited Nations Charter—which can be invoked against Japan at any time.

大洋馬夫

律師,歷史領域愛好者

15112篇原創